Where does the content direction come from?

From the measured gap. Citlyze builds each brief from the prompt you are losing, the sources the engines cited for competitors and the questions the answer covered.

How do I know if the new content worked?

The prompt behind each brief keeps being tracked. Once the content is live, the following windows show whether your brand is now named or cited on that prompt, and by which engines.

Can I use my own writers instead of the drafts?

Yes. Many teams use the brief alone and hand it to their writers or agency. Drafts are optional and can be regenerated with a different angle.

Does this work for existing pages as well as new ones?

Yes. When the gap is on a page you already have, the recommendation points at that page and the brief lists what to add or change, rather than proposing a new article.

Use case

Turn lost prompts into content that gets cited

Citlyze turns the prompts you lose in AI answers into briefs and reviewable drafts, grounded in the sources the engines already trust, then measures whether the new content earned the mention.

Start free trial Take the 3-minute product tour

14-day free trial · No credit card required

Content gaps: tracked prompts and coverageImage to add

Trusted by marketing, SEO and agency teams.

ChatGPT
Gemini
Perplexity
DeepSeek
ByteDance
Grok
Google AI Overview & AI Mode
Bing Copilot

Citlyze recommendations queue with ranked prompt gaps and their priority

Find the gap

Start from a prompt you are losing

Recommendations are ranked by the prompts where competitors are named and you are not. Each one shows the engines involved, the sources cited and the angle the answer took.

Gaps ranked by visibility at stake
Cited sources per gap
Angle the answer currently takes

See it in the tour

Content brief

AsterFlow · field service scheduling software

Draft brief

Target prompt

Which field service scheduling software should my team compare?

Decision stageUS marketCompetitor win

Sources to use

g2.comcomparison proof

reddit.combuyer objection

partnerstack.comcategory guide

Recommended angle

Show why AsterFlow covers dispatch-heavy teams better than lighter scheduling tools.

Brief it

A brief built from what the engines cite

Each brief lists the questions the answer must cover, the claims it needs to support and the pages that currently earn the citation, so writers know exactly what to beat.

Questions the answer must cover
Claims to support with evidence
Pages to outrank in the citation list

Start free trial

Draft review

AsterFlow comparison page · markdown export

Ready for edit

Page preview

Best field service scheduling software for dispatch teams

Compare tools by dispatch coverage, mobile workflows, route planning, and the sources answer engines cite.

6 cited sources

4 FAQs

2 proof gaps

Human review queue

Source claimsNeeds review

FAQ coverageIncluded

Comparison languageTighten

Export formatMarkdown

Export only after source claims are approved.Export markdown

Draft and measure

Reviewable drafts, then proof the fix worked

Drafts arrive ready for your review and edits, with the changes from the brief highlighted. Publish, then watch the same prompt in the next windows to confirm the mention landed.

Every draft waits for your review before anything goes live
Changes highlighted against the brief
Same prompt re-measured after publishing

Start free trial

FAQ

Content from AI gaps

Want a demo of Citlyze? Book a demo

No. Drafts are produced for your review and stay in the workspace until a person edits, approves and publishes them through your own CMS.

Keep exploring

Content Agents Query Fan-Out Competitor benchmarking

Does AI recommend you when buyers ask?

Track how ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, DeepSeek, ByteDance, Grok, Google AI Overview & AI Mode, and Bing Copilot mention, cite, and rank your brand. Review tracked answers and the gaps to close.

Start free trial Book a demo

No credit card required

A content lead publishing a page at a standing desk